|
speaker
Ralph Nader
taken from http://www.crashingtheparty.org/bio.html
Geboren: 1934 als Sohn
libanesischer Immigranten.
1951 Jurastudium in
Princeton
1955 Harvard Law School
1959 April: article published in The Nation, "The Safe
Car You Can't Buy," in which he declared, "It
is clear Detroit today is designing automobiles for style,
cost, performance and calculated obsolescence, but not --
despite the 5,000,000 reported accidents, nearly 40,000
fatalities, 110,000 permanent disabilities and 1,500,000
injuries yearly -- for safety."
1996 und 2000 Präsidentschaftskandidat der US Grünen
BIOGRAPHY
/ LEBENSLAUF (pdf,
rtf)
en detail:
In 1963, Ralph Nader,
then an unknown twenty-nine-year old attorney, abandoned
a conventional law practice in Hartford, Connecticut, and
hitchhiked to Washington, D.C., to begin a long odyssey
of professional citizenship. "I had one suitcase,"
he recalled. "I stayed in the YMCA. Walked across a
little street and had a hot dog, my last." (A few years
later he would expose the repulsive ingredients that go
into hot dogs.) Taking a job as a consultant to the U.S.
Department of Labor, working for Assistant Secretary of
Labor Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Nader moonlighted as a freelance
writer for The Nation and The Christian Science Monitor.
He also acted as an unpaid adviser to a Senate subcommittee,
chaired by Connecticut Senator Abraham Ribicoff, which was
exploring what role the federal government might play in
auto safety.
If such circumstances seemed an unlikely
springboard for launching one of the great citizen movements
of the late 20th century, one must look more closely at
the man himself, his values, his upbringing, his intellect
-- all of which find some personal imprint in the many citizen
organizations he has founded.
Born in 1934 to Lebanese immigrants
Rose and Nathra Nader, Ralph always took the rights and
responsibilities of American citizenship to heart. "When
I sailed past the Statue of Liberty," his father once
said, "I took it seriously." Civic duty had a
special meaning in Winsted, the small town in northwestern
Connecticut where Nathra ran the Highland Arms Restaurant
and engaged his customers in spirited debate about public
affairs. Studious, bright and intense, Ralph followed the
Yankees, played with David Halberstam, the future journalist,
and read back issues of the Congressional Record with equal
enthusiasm. By age 14 he had read the early muckrakers --
Ida Tarbell, Lincoln Steffens, Upton Sinclair and George
Seldes -- who were to inspire his thinking about the distribution
of power in American society and the possibilities of citizenship.
Entering Princeton in 1951 as Dwight
Eisenhower presided over the conformist "silent generation,"
Nader was never one for fitting in. "At Princeton the
chief act of rebellion was to refuse to wear white buck
shoes," he once recalled. After finding dead birds
on the campus lawns, he tried to ban the spraying of DDT
on the trees; the editors of the Daily Princetonian scoffed,
claiming that the university's chemistry and biology professors
would surely have objected if DDT posed any danger. When
local restaurants challenged the license of a popular hot
dog vendor, Nader tried to rally fellow students to protest
and was appalled at the lukewarm response. Apart from such
breaches of Princeton's civic torpor, Nader used most of
his time there indulging his voracious and eclectic mind,
spending hours in the library and learning Chinese and other
languages.
After graduating from Princeton in
1955, Nader went on to Harvard Law School where he developed
an intense distaste for its narrow intellectualism and moral
complacency. "It was a high-priced tool factory, only
instead of tools and dies, they were producing hired advocates
for corporate law firms and corporations," Nader later
complained. "If you were worried about issues of right
and wrong and justice and injustice, you were considered
soft intellectually." Nader once asked a law professor
why, given the abundance of courses and seminars in the
catalog, there was no course on "food and the law."
As he tells the story,
The professor, nonplussed for an
instant, blurted, 'Food?' Recovering his composure, he allowed
that the reason was simply that the subject had not developed
to a suitable intensity to qualify as an adequate intellectual
challenge at the School. Searching for a frame of reference,
I asked him what course would so qualify. He looked up at
the sky and then a definite glow crossed his face as he
responded: 'Tax.'
It was at Harvard where Nader first
explored another unorthodox legal topic: the engineering
design of automobiles. His research resulted in an April
1959 article published in The Nation, "The Safe Car
You Can't Buy," in which he declared, "It is clear
Detroit today is designing automobiles for style, cost,
performance and calculated obsolescence, but not -- despite
the 5,000,000 reported accidents, nearly 40,000 fatalities,
110,000 permanent disabilities and 1,500,000 injuries yearly
-- for safety."
After several years of lawyering
in Hartford and footloose world travelling as a freelance
writer, Nader arrived in Washington and began work on a
book elaborating on the themes of his Nation article. His
rendezvous with history was nearly derailed when he left
part of his completed manuscript in a New York City taxicab.
With customary determination, however, he rewrote the book
in breakneck speed and published Unsafe at Any Speed: The
Designed-in Dangers of the American Automobile (Grossman)
in November 1965.
The chief target of the book was
General Motors' "sporty" Corvair, whose faulty
rear suspension system, Nader argued, made it possible to
skid violently and roll over. More generally, Nader's book
documented how Detroit habitually subordinated safety to
style and marketing concerns. The main immediate cause of
car injuries, Nader demonstrated, was not the "nut
behind the wheel" so often blamed by the auto industry,
but the inherent engineering and design deficiencies of
the motor vehicle that was woefully uncrashworthy. Solutions
must focus, accordingly, on the vehicle itself.
This pioneering insight, that the
safety remedy often lies not with individual consumers but
unresponsive oligopolistic manufacturers, would become a
recurring theme in Nader's many investigations. As he wrote
in Unsafe:
A great problem of contemporary life
is how to control the power of economic interests which
ignore the harmful effects of their applied science and
technology. The automobile tragedy is one of the most serious
of these man-made assaults on the human body....Our society's
obligation to protect the 'body rights' of its citizens
with vigorous resolve and ample resources requires the precise,
authoritative articulation and front-rank support which
is being devoted to civil rights.
Despite reviews in national publications,
initial sales of the book were modest. If the public did
not immediately appreciate the import of Nader's book, its
chief target, General Motors, did. Worried about litigation
challenging the Corvair's safety, GM hired private detectives
to tail Nader in an attempt to dig up information that might
discredit him. Instead, journalist James Ridgeway broke
the story about GM's snooping and dirty tricks in The New
Republic, prompting Senator Ribicoff's subcommittee to summon
James Roche, president of General Motors, to explain his
company's harassment -- and apologize.
The remarkable incident catapulted
auto safety into the public spotlight and helped send Unsafe
at Any Speed to the top of the bestseller lists. More importantly,
as one Nader biographer, Charles McCarry, wrote, "It
certified [Nader's] virtue, gave birth to him as a public
figure, and equipped him with an image that has remained
a combination of the best qualities of Lincoln of Illinois
and David of 1 Samuel 17." The incident also served
as a proof of a core Nader conviction: that one person,
acting with intelligence and persistence, can make a difference
-- even if the target is the largest corporation in the
world.
The 32-year-old Nader -- acclaimed
as a David slaying a Goliath, an underdog hero in the age
of impersonal, unaccountable bureaucracies -- did not see
his newfound celebrity status as a ticket to riches, political
gain or respectability in the Establishment. He saw it instead
as a tool for advancing an expansive new form of citizenship
in shaping the economy and civic life. For Nader, there
was no virtue in being a passive member of the "Silent
Majority" that Richard Nixon would later celebrate.
Real patriotism, Nader asserted, is caring enough about
your country to roll up your sleeves and do something to
make it more humane, moral and caring. Forget the idea of
being an inconsequential private citizen, Nader counseled;
one should be an engaged, questioning "public citizen."


|